Talk:Holman rule

A fact from Holman rule appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 April 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the January 2017 reinstatement of the Holman Rule allows members of the United States House of Representatives to amend routine spending bills to mandate the firing of individual Federal employees?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2017/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Holman Rule.

Wikipedia

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Perspectives from academics

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

At least one academic (Rick Hills at NYU Law School) has suggested that this rule may be an unconstitutional bill of attainder, per United States v. Lovett. I haven't found other published commentary regarding the constitutionality of the rule, but if other academics opine on this issue, then we may want to add coverage of their comments. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 04:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Patricia J. Williams has written on the same point, see here. I've added. Thanks. Neutrality^talk 04:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply