Talk:Hindutva Watch

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

Issues with the article

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The main contributor of this article has been banned for using multiple accounts, this page also has been be mainly written by the author and several other IP users who have had no other contributions on wiki aside from this article. I think it is safe to assume that several IP users were created only to edit this article, which would make it eligible for COI. I am adding the template for the time being and leaving this discussion to further discuss the issue. Xoocit (talk) 17:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the information. I'll continue working on the article and aim to present it as neutrally as possible SereneMoon (talk) 07:26, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@SereneMoon: Your edits contain no references. WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH is not allowed. Please add WP:RELIABLE SOURCES or revert these changes. These changes, I should note, appear non-neutral themselves. Gotitbro (talk) 09:41, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Response to COI Concerns

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello all, I appreciate the notice regarding possible COI. I have contributed to improving the article using reliable, third-party sources and have aimed to maintain a neutral, fact-based tone throughout. I am open to collaboration, cleanup, or restructuring suggestions from other editors and am happy to work with the community to ensure this page meets all neutrality and sourcing standards.

If specific phrasing or claims are of concern, please flag them here and I will assist with sourcing, rewording, or removing as needed. I am not paid to edit this page, and the intent is purely to document publicly verifiable information.

Thanks and looking forward to constructive input. Ahte.04 (talk) 12:34, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

I think the article should qualify for a Speedy G5 deletion, don't know why it wasn't deleted in the first place Xoocit (talk) 10:19, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply