Talk:Hazel Ascot

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Appreciation Society

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Being not about Ms. Ascot herself, I'm not sure any of that should be included. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:48, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I disagree, if her name was used as a front for something sinister, then it is encyclopedically relevant as long as it is written in a clear and balanced way. Which I think it does in this case. Also, the information is well-sourced, so it's not like it has been taken from some obscure personal blog or anything.