Talk:Harvard School

Harvard School has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 10, 2026. (Reviewed version).

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA review

Latest comment: 6 months ago13 comments2 people in discussion

Pass. MSincccc (talk) 12:37, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Harvard School/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: UndercoverClassicist (talk · contribs) 13:50, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: MSincccc (talk · contribs) 10:59, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Images

File:Francesco Solimena - Venus at the Forge of Vulcan, 1704.jpg- Source link is dead.
- Fixed -- Getty had changed the item ID. UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 07:30, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
File:(Barcelona) The Golden Bough - Joseph Mallord William Turner - Tate Britain.jpg- It is missing a US public domain tag.
- Now added. UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 11:32, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
File:Aeneas and Turnus.jpg-You could consider replacing the source link.
- The source link is dead without an archive, so I've marked it and put in an alternative where the image can be seen in print. UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 07:30, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have no further suggestions for the images then. Fine to proceed. MSincccc (talk) 13:05, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

MSincccc (talk) 11:10, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Prose

Precursors

You could consider renaming the second sub-section to In the nineteenth century.

MSincccc (talk) 09:05, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Three of the four paragraphs are about the preceding centuries, hence the preposition "to". UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 09:52, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I get it now. Thank you for explaining. MSincccc (talk) 10:34, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

That’s all from me. I hope I have provided a review in line with GA standards; I assume this one is also heading to FAC in the foreseeable future.

I will conduct the spot checks next, when I have the time. MSincccc (talk) 09:10, 8 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Source-to-text spot check

95- Done
101- Done
102- Done
103- Done
139- Done

Bottom line

The sources support the article, the images are properly licensed, and the prose meets GA standards. I am therefore passing the review. MSincccc (talk) 12:37, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.