Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Hampton Inn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Danilo Two in topic Request: Update History


[edit]

The customer service not good. Front desk people can be rude, and management doesn't care.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.192.36.98 (talk) 06:26, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


I have tried to remove the 'advertisement-ness' to the Cloud Nine section, but I wonder if it should be done away with altogether. Discussion and/or suggestions on this matter would be greatly appreciated. ~ Porphyric Hemophiliac § 20:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


It doesn't sound like an advertisement at all, it just sounds informative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.251.125.85 (talk) 17:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think it sounds a lot like an advertisement, and when I come looking to read about the Hampton Inn, I don't need to read a whole section about their beds. 76.114.193.65 (talk) 03:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

To be quite honest, I slept in one of these beds this past week, and am trying to locate the maker of the mattresses to purchase one. I hate hotels, but this one was definitely one I'd go back to. And no, I don't work for them, I'm a marine elctronics dude. I fix ships. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.196.111.57 (talk) 12:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hampton by Hilton name=

[edit]

I noticed the article was confusing and not current so I have been trying to add citatiosn and help it but I think I just found press that shows the brand was renamed to "Hampton by Hilton." It looks like it used to only go by that name abroad but the company is rebranding the whole chain now. So I'm adding in more "Hampton by Hilton" references to clear that up


Looks like the press supports that the name has changed, I can move the page and edit the intro.IdlePlayground (talk) 22:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hampton by Hilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Request: Update History

[edit]

Hi editors, on behalf of Hilton via Coyne through my work at Beutler Ink, I have a request to update this article's History section for editors to review. In the collapse box below is my proposed draft with updates in green, followed by a bulleted list that explains the changes.

Thank you, Danilo Two (talk) 17:44, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

You do realize that you've included Linkedin and YouTube as references. It matters not if those are carryovers from the current article, I won't sustain their use in any revised/replaced/untouched text. They ought to be replaced. Regards,  Spintendo  06:22, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi Spintendo, I'll look for replacement sources. Back soon! Danilo Two (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Revised request

[edit]

I have revised this request based on feedback from @Spintendo: my previous request included existing article content that was poorly sourced; such content is now removed.

On behalf of Hilton via Coyne through my work at Beutler Ink, I have a request to update this article's History section for editors to review. In the collapse box below is my proposed draft with updates in green, followed by a bulleted list that explains the changes.

Thank you, Danilo Two (talk) 19:04, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 13 July 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 16:19, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply


Hampton by Hilton → Hampton Inn – The former name "Hampton Inn" still seems to be in wide use. See this, this, this, etc. Most directories and Google Maps still list the locations as "Hampton Inn", suggesting this is still the WP:COMMONNAME. Compare how the page for Howard Johnson's still uses the apostrophe-S despite the company officially dropping it in the 80s, as many sources still call that chain "Howard Johnson's". Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • (What did I screw up now?) 19:09, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Support rename - this is the WP:COMMONNAME in my experience and searching, unless someone can positively prove otherwise. Yojo98 (talk) 19:44, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Here's another idea: Is it possible to name the article something along the lines of "Hampton (brand)", with an opening sentence of "Hampton by Hilton, formerly known as Hampton Inn, is an American chain of hotels trademarked by Hilton Worldwide ..."? It could be worth considering. Danilo Two (talk) 16:21, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Necrothesp: @BarrelProof: @Yojo98: your thoughts on Danilo Two's counter-argument? I think they do bring up a good point but this could still break either way. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • (What did I screw up now?) 03:56, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
If I don't bias my search by looking specifically for one version of the name or the other, "Hampton Inn" is very dominant in the results. Even the hotel's own website at hilton.com almost always identifies places as "Hampton Inn" or "Hampton Inn and Suites" (or "Hampton Inn & Suites"). Even pictures of the hotels show these names primarily on the signs. I think it's clear that Danilo is cherry-picking. "Hampton (brand)" is awkward and doesn't make it evident that it's about a hotel brand. See WP:NATURAL. "Hampton Inn" is not just a former name – it's being used now – even by Hilton. On the subset of signage that uses "Hampton by Hilton", the "by Hilton" is tiny and on a different line of text – often so small it is unreadable. Some signs have "Hampton" very large, then a second line with a slightly smaller "Inn & Suites" and then a third line with a really tiny "by Hilton". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 04:11, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I would also like to point out that most of the Wyndham brands are "officially" named "X by Wyndham" (e.g. Super 8 by Wyndham, AmericInn by Wyndham, etc.), but their articles are all at their Wyndham-less names. So there is precedent for not using the "by" part. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • (What did I screw up now?) 05:44, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
My comment stands. -- Necrothesp (talk) 07:54, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
My comment also stands. I agree with BarrelProof's reasoning here. Yojo98 (talk) 13:07, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.