Talk:Global Press Institute

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Globalpressinstitute (talk · contribs)

== Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CuriousRDR ==

@CuriousRDRIt appears you have violated the neutral points of view terms. It appears you were a former employee of the organization and are on record in both the Semafor and CJR article links that you added. It appears you are the source of the controversy surrounding the organization and have changed significant language on the page in line with your other efforts to discredit the organization , from which it appears you were terminated from.

@adminsuggest undoing all CuriousRDR edits and flagging or deactivating the account. 207.213.21.101 (talk) 20:44, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

hi, any follow up on this? What was the decision? Thanks. Be decent (talk) 19:01, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply