Talk:Geographic profiling

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

2005 comments

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Yes, the two probably should be merged. Geographic profiling was the original term used. --70.113.41.197

The Geographical profiling article isn't quite an accurate description, nor the proper term. I don't see anything useful in that article, to add and merge to this article. As 70.113.41.197 says, Geographic profiling is the correct term. --Aude 03:11, 29 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Section removal

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In re:

The changes I made to this article ARE constructive. I initiated the original article, however, someone added superfluous and inaccurate content which I have - unsuccessfully - tried to delete. The commentary based on Holmes and Holmes book was not about the development of a geographic profile, but rather was Stea's (1969) list of elements in the perception of distance. As written, this was section was confusing and extraneous to the Wikipedia article. 66.25.164.249 (talk) 04:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC) <-- copied here from User talk:66.25.164.249 by User:Aude -->Reply

Use EDIT SUMMARIES! How are we supposed to know what your rationale is for deleting whole sections? If you don't explain your edits it just looks like vandalism and will be reverted. -- œ ^™ 10:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply