This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I added a reliable print reference to Publishers Weekly and a one sentence summary of the story from the PW article. An entry as short as this one doesn't need more at the moment. There is no question of the notability of this entry; all CLAMP's work is world-famous, and this manga is no exception. For example, PW boasts that their article is the first time that CLAMP has allowed a preview of their work to be published. Hope that solves the problem. Timothy Perper (talk) 15:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}