Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:First Opium War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 days ago by Johnarhanthehsifi in topic Where did the battle template go?
Former good article nomineeFirst Opium War was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 12, 2017Good article nomineeNot listed
February 26, 2019Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 23, 2007, and August 23, 2008.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Aelmsu

[edit]

I've reread the sources, to make sure I didn't miss anything (and perhaps I missed twice), but I came up short.

For starters, Gelber does not mention anything about where the women were in my reading, so I disagree with the use of "contrary to this view". I also rechecked volume 10 of the The Cambridge History of China (originally the cited source) and located the line about opium being the single most profitable commodity of the 19th century, but could not find anything about the British Empire's revenues (if it even makes sense to speak of such a thing). He says "Opium now flowed freely from all of India to Canton, and by 1836, total imports came to $18 million, making it the world's most valuable single commodity trade of the nineteenth century".

I have not read the entirety of Joanna's book, but I have checked each page referenced and find no mention of a ban. I'm welcome to this being a case of an incomplete citation, or differing edition, and a quote would be enough to budge me on this point.

Jardine Paper

[edit]

I would like to redirect or merge this unsourced stub to this main article. Please advise. Bearian (talk) 07:41, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

<Macao> vs <Macau>

[edit]

I notice that there are six uses of the former in the article at present, and the other 30 or so references to (what I think is) the same place use the latter. Is there a meaningful difference between the two, perhaps reflecting different governance or perspectives in historiography? Or should we normalize the article to all be with ? I don't know anything about this topic so would appreciate if someone more familiar could edit as appropriate! Determinerteeth (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Where did the battle template go?

[edit]

There were 25ish military battles that were fought between the Qing Dynasty and the British Armies. Why are they not shown here? They used to be. Johnarhanthehsifi (talk) 16:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply