Talk:Fifty-state strategy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ignoring Congress

Latest comment: 8 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This writeup completely ignores the importance of a 50 state strategy to winning control of Congress. It also fails to point out the undemocratic nature of the Electoral College, which is why a 50 state strategy won't work (in the short run). However there is an attractive reform to the EC in the form of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. A 50 state strategy would be very helpful in passing the NPVIC, leading to presidential campaigns that take all 50 states seriously. Bottom line: this is a biased pro-establishment writeup that is hostile to the 50 state strategy. Burressd (talk) 09:43, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply