Talk:Eurodicautom
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Gnomingstuff in topic Likely AI text
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Likely AI text
[edit]Concerns were raised previously about AI-generated content in this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information for why this is tagged; however, note that fixing the issue requires more than just removing the superficial signs. The edit this pertains to is this and probably followups by this user. Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:45, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Gnomingstuff! I'm not talking about the contents here but the article itself and the categories (below) such as: Low-importance European Union articles... Well, considering that mid-1990s the EU already spent about a third of its annual budget in translation and interpreting, and that Eurodicautom was one of the first (if not the first) public databases and research for multilingual !!! automatic translation methods (ai translators), I wouldn't dare to say that's low-importance. I am a former user of that service, by the way. Many regards and best wishes, Luna92 (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- I don't have anything to do with those. Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:07, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class European Union articles
- Low-importance European Union articles
- WikiProject European Union articles
- Stub-Class Linguistics articles
- Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
- Stub-Class applied linguistics articles
- Applied Linguistics Task Force articles
- Automatically assessed Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles

