Talk:Epideictic

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

3 Other Branches

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

They should be explained, linked or article created.Curb Chain (talk) 12:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Title of article

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seems a bit strange that the current title of this article, Epideictic, is an adjective. Should the article be moved to the corresponding noun form of Epideixis instead? Another option is Epideictic oratory, which is the bolded text in the article's first sentence. Hdjensofjfnen (tap) 05:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Remarkably uninteresting article for such an interesting topic

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In praise, it exists. For that readers are thankful. In blame, it is boring, and so, readers are bored.

WP needs to do a better job making articles compelling and interlinked, or it will lose its relevance in the age of chatbots which generatively spit out much more compelling and vivid gloss on fundamentals like this topic. Humans, let us aim higher! 2600:4040:5AEF:B400:2D8F:C1B9:AA58:CDF6 (talk) 01:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply