Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Emma Watson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Deathlibrarian in topic Watson's relationships
Featured articleEmma Watson is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 15, 2009.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 30, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
September 10, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
September 23, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 30, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 26, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 15, 2018, April 15, 2023, April 15, 2024, and April 15, 2025.
Current status: Featured article

Watson's relationships

[edit]

There is no reason for this article's Personal life section to include an enumeration of 10(!) past boyfriends. In what way is that of "historical, societal, scientific, intellectualic significance"? I suggest deleting that part.

I would like to know everyone's opinion on this matter: Should any of Watson's past relationships be mentioned in the personal life section of her Wikipedia article? Or should none of them be included, considering that Wikipedia is not a gossip site, and the mention of her marriage, if it were to happen, would be the only relevant information regarding her relationships in the personal life section? Bibliophile Dragon (talk) 16:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Nemov, @Seasider53, @MrOllie I would love to know your thoughts on this matter. Is that okay? I would like to reach a consensus on this matter if that's alright with you. Bibliophile Dragon (talk) 02:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
If you would like a consensus you can start by restoring the article back to the status quo until you have support. Nemov (talk) 04:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Simply blanking reliably sourced material entirely is not acceptible. MrOllie (talk) 12:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
It is if the information is trivial, which it was. Seasider53 (talk) 12:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
That's to be determined via discussion. Please restore the status quo. Nemov (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I agree that a listing of past short-term romantic relationships is the purview of a gossip site and is not relevant for this article. CapitalSasha ~ talk 12:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
We create biographies on wikipedia, not a gossip column like you have in People magazine, Seasider and Bibliophile Dragon in my opinion have done the right thing in removing the relationship stuff. I only think it's worth mentioning, when one gets married or has children within a relationship. Govvy (talk) 17:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I can't see any consensus agreed upon to remove the information from the page, so I am reverting it to how it was originally, with the information back in, and ensuring all sources are RS. Proper procedure, ie removing the information with consensus, was not followed here, so I'm restoring the information until consensus decides it should be removed, following discussion. IN any case, bio pages typically include relationship information, there is no wikipedia policy that says it needs to be removed. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I still can't see any consensus to remove the relationship information, it was removed previously in 2024 by one now non active editor, without discussion or explanation. I've put the information back in until it can be discussed and a consensus is made to remove here on the talk page. Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:33, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Profile Picture

[edit]

The profile picture is dated. Wouldn't it be better to have a more recent picture of Emma as her profile picture? Just a thought. What-the-hell-12! (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

See Talk:Emma Watson/Archive 8#Infobox image. We need a new discussion if we want to change it. Lectonar (talk) 11:26, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Does not have an MSt

[edit]

According to multiple reports she doesn't seem to have graduated with a master's degree and instead seems to have just 'advanced' to a DPhil at Oxford so the infobox MSt degree should be removed.

https://www.dragonschool.org/eminent_dragons/emma-watson/
https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/25068816.emma-watson-drops-oxford-university-degree/?ref=rss
https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/25827997.emma-watson-studying-phd-oxford-university-doctor/ ~2026-32996-50 (talk) 15:51, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:26, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
This was reverted when there's more evidence she doesn't have the degree than that she does... At most her infobox can have University of Oxford but not the degree — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-32996-50 (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Done I've removed it again. @Wikimaker17, please do not add the supposed Oxford degree to the infobox without discussing here first, or at the very least citing a source. Day Creature (talk) 21:35, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply