Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:E. Michael Jones

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by PARAKANYAA in topic Sources definitely evidence GNG

Looking good

[edit]

This is coming out much better than I expected. Good work on digging up sources. —DIYeditor (talk) 10:54, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Liberal Catholicism" and Modernism in the Catholic Church not identical

[edit]

"One year after being fired from Saint Mary's, he founded Fidelity, a traditionalist Catholic antimodernist journal that decried liberal currents in the Catholic Church." Are we sure, "Liberal Catholicism"? Liberal Catholicism is specifically about ecclesial-State political relations. "Modernism in the Catholic Church" usually means theology (especially historical criticism). FatalSubjectivities (talk) 15:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The phrase liberal currents in the Catholic Church is meant to capture post-VII social liberalism in the Church in the United States. Modernism also works, though it's a bit more technical than the average reader would be able to understand. It's a bit hard to write about Jones for a general audience and capture the nuance within his traditionalism, since most readers aren't/don't have exposure to orthodox Catholicism, radtrads, or tradcaths more broadly. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
After thinking some more, Cafeteria Catholicism comes to mind as probably being the appropriate link for the post-Vatican II currents. Something like theological dissent in the Catholic Church would probably be best, but a recent RfD concluded that this among the working for Dissenting catholic. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Horror: A Biography

[edit]

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

You might also find interesting: Biohistorian15 (talk) 15:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
And we may also want to use:
Modern Literary Criticism (CSPAN, July 13, 1996)
video icon https://www.c-span.org/video/?73644-1/modern-literary-criticism
Biohistorian15 (talk) 10:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you were just to get rid of the section describing his books;

[edit]

I don't see why this draft couldn't be published? StrongALPHA (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

I agree, just more lefty WIKI bias... ~2026-82946-1 (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sources definitely evidence GNG

[edit]

This article is tonally weird but with some changes I think it could be accepted. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:56, 11 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, personally I would have liked more time to write this one. Noticed today that it was moved into the mainspace. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:54, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Just happened to think about this today, happy that it was. Was a major omission (and thanks for writing it!). PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:08, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply