Talk:Digital commons

Economics Mid‑importance

	Economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software.

Open (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen

December 2012

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

balthas (talk) 13:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC) Hi I just found this article on "Digital commons(economics) through the crosslinking from the article on "knowledge commons" and I was wondering if it wouldn't make sense to merge the two entries, as the content seems largely identical. Any thoughts?Reply