Talk:Defender Association of Philadelphia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Defender Association of Philadelphia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because any problems can be quickly addressed and the organization is notable ----JumpLike23 (talk) 19:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

willl address concerns ASAP --JumpLike23 (talk) 20:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Now, I have significantly changed the previous version and only lifted the significant facts from that source. My apologies. --JumpLike23 (talk) 05:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article still contains copyright violating text. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Why was there still copyright violating text? --JumpLike23 (talk) 23:20, 9 September 2016 (UTC)Reply