This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This article is very poorly written. Very promotional. The history shows several SPAs who heavily edited this page and almost nothing else (except for the page of subject's partner - Nanette Gartrell).
Despite being advised on their talk pages about COI, they have continued to edit (rather aggressively and enthusiastically but only on these accounts), and specifically, remove the COI tags. I have reinstated them for now. I consider any removal of tags without valid rationale, as agreed on the talk page by consensus, to be further breaches of 3RR, COI & PROMO and grounds for requesting page protection to curb their interference. History
Rayman60, I see nothing in this article that justifies the tags or the accusations on the editors above, and bearing in mind WP:BRD, and WP:3R, nothing that authorises you to insist on a discussion about their removal. Please comment. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
As I said at Talk:Nanette Gartrell, I don't think there's cause to add tags and imply wrongdoing on the subject's part. There isn't a protracted dispute, and the edits were mostly to update references or fix the writing. SarahSV(talk)05:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
