Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Crusades

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ~2026-37188-07 in topic Crusades
Former featured article candidateCrusades is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleCrusades has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 11, 2006Good article nomineeListed
November 14, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
June 2, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
June 23, 2014Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
October 6, 2015Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
January 3, 2017Peer reviewReviewed
April 26, 2017Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
May 6, 2017Good article nomineeListed
May 27, 2017WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
July 15, 2017Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 5, 2018Peer reviewNot reviewed
July 17, 2019Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 28, 2019Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
October 12, 2019Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 22, 2020Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

10th Crusade

[edit]

Hello, It is in due time that the Tenth Crusade be added to this page.

Whilst my peers argue about when the Tenth Crusade started, it is agreed that is was solidified on December 9, 1917 when the British captured Jerusalem. Since then the Holy Land has been controlled by Western powers and solidified with the establishment of the State of Israel on the 14th May 1948. Modernhistorian2026 (talk) 20:31, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Modernhistorian2026 i think this rather falls under Christian Zionism Braganza (talk) 18:32, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Crusades vs Crusading movement

[edit]

@Deeday-UK: Your edit leaves the relationship between these things rather unclear. Srnec (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good source with useful information missing from this article

[edit]

Crusades

[edit]

The lead section softens the medievel motivations too much.It should clearly state the Byzantine request for aid,attacks on pilgrims,destruction of the holy site.and rapid territorial expansion.The current wording is off,tensions escalated,routes became difficult is soft to what really happened,the Byzantine Empire called for military assistince in 1095,there are documanted attacts on christians,the destruction of the holy church Sepulchre in 1009,and the rapid territorial growth and expansion from the muslims that threatened the christians and byzantine's,The current lead wording doesn't reflect the urgency decribed in primary sources.A clearer summary of the Byzantine request for aid,pilgrims being slaughtered,the destruction of the holy lands and the rapid expansion of the muslim's,the wording is everything and should not be watered down this is why and how history is lost. ~2026-37188-07 (talk) 09:29, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply