Talk:Clearance diver

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

Underwater diving Mid‑importance

	Underwater diving portal This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Underwater divingWikipedia:WikiProject Underwater divingTemplate:WikiProject Underwater divingUnderwater diving
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for Clearance diver (13 sections)
Section name	Byte count		Prose size (words)
Section name	Header	Total	Header	Total
(Top)	1,086	1,086	108	108
History	1,939	1,939	258	258
Training	1,441	1,441	95	95
Scope of activity	1,308	1,308	155	155
Nations with clearance diving groups	170	12,087	7	382
Africa	69	69	0	0
Asia	277	277	0	0
Europe	2,994	8,709	0	375
United Kingdom	5,715	5,715	375	375
North America	1,490	1,490	0	0
Oceania	1,372	1,372	0	0
See also	263	263	0	0
References	118	118	0	0
Total	18,242	18,242	998	998

Norway

The Norwegian Minedykkerkommando is not using SDBA (anymore?). They are now using several canadian-made rebreathers: Viper SE, Viper + and S-24. They also previously used Siva 55 and Siva +. 00:42, 20 December 2006 User:80.203.49.137

Article structure

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Article structure should be improved. Any suggestions? • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 05:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply