Talk:Circumferential Road 5

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Circumferential Road 5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718233440/http://www.dpwh.gov.ph/infrastructure/super_regions/lub/img/c5_exp15.jpg to http://www.dpwh.gov.ph/infrastructure/super_regions/lub/img/c5_exp15.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Split proposal

This article refers to the both route, C-5 and the road, Carlos P. Garcia Avenue, which is confusing. -hueman1 (talk) 07:31, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

If a particular section of a highway is part of an overall highway numbering system, lacking notability (other than just "official" or memorial naming), then those sections need to be included in the primary road to which they are a part of. Any perceived confusion can be mitigated within designated sections. Splitting of individual sections, official or memorial named, just creates more confusion to those not familiar with the area of concern as this is a worldwide encyclopedia. Otr500 (talk) 15:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

• Philippines/Mapping conventions/Roads. Otr500 (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

I don't agree with a split either and I don't see any confusion between C-5 and Carlos P. Garcia Avenue, and they both point to the same road. @HueMan1: I think you might be conflating Carlos P. Garcia Avenue with the unrelated road through UP Diliman, ending near the UP Town Center at the Katipunan Avenue intersection, which is not part of C-5 either. I may agree splitting the expressway from the southern terminus of C-5, across SLEX and Skyway, toward CAVITEX, but not the other short, named segments of C-5 that are not notable. -TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

I don't agree splitting either. The Taguig segmebt (SLEX – Bagong Ilog flyover/Pasig Boulevard) which is sometimes called Carlos P. Garcia Avenue does not merit its own article as it fails WP:GEOROAD. It is better to retain C-5 article as it is. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Separate creation for N11 highway (Philippines)

Can I remove N11's redirect to C-5 and create a separate article?

@BoholMappingAndRoutes: Sure, why not? Tip: use four tildes (~~~~) to sign your messages. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:07, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Separate articles on named parts of the highway

These are Eulogio S. Rodriguez Jr. Avenue, from Libis to Pasig River, and Carlos P. Garcia Avenue, from Pasig River to SLEX. Howard the Duck (talk) 20:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Map

Add a map. Jidanni (talk) 01:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Suggested expansion of controversy section

I request some more capable editors to expand the controversy section. The C5 extension flyover is being blamed as the main cause of delays of the LRT-1 south extension project. The flyover overtook the ROW intended for an important part of the Phase 2 South extension. At least one congressman called for the removal of it. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:32, 4 July 2026 (UTC)