Talk:Circular folds

Anatomy: Gross Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inconsistent spelling: Kerckring vs. kerkring; circulares vs. circulates

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The lead paragraph and the "Composition" section differ from each other. I don't know which is correct. Another possibility is that various spellings are considered acceptable. Oaklandguy (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Oaklandguy! Even though the article has been through many modifications, I have also noticed spelling discrepancies in the scientific literature. These spelling differences have been referenced in the "History" section. In general, the article now only refers to them as "circular folds" to avoid the nominate and Latin terminology which has varying spellings. Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Plica Circulares

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The topic was well described, but the Latin Epiphet for the larger folds, plica circularis was not mentioned. As a result, I found this urge to mention it in your article! Ananya Gupta Bhaya (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply