Talk:Chuck Lovell

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

It is requested that an image or photograph of Chuck Lovell be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites.

Upload

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2021 and 12 March 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Esheboyette, Jmisko, BradyAkinsWR303.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

SRO at Jefferson, handcuffing

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@NedFausa: correctly removed a paragraph that wasn't supported by the citations about behavior while Lovell was a SRO. It might deserve a slight mention, certainly not how it was. Here's the case text for the outcome of the lawsuit by the student; it's notable (to me) that Lovell isn't mentioned in the text (other than being involved); the vast majority of the conduct was by the principal. I don't know if there is more that supports it, but the case outcome seems like the best source. tedder (talk) 18:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

That case text is merely a ruling on the dean of students' motion for summary judgment. Basically, he argued that he should be removed from the suit because he wasn't involved in the physical restraint; the court said no, you seem involved enough that it merits proceeding to trial to hash out. The case did eventually go to trial and in 2009, after hearing the girl's lawyer make her case, the judge ultimately granted the dean's motion (i.e., ruling he didn't do anything wrong), and a jury subsequently determined that the two officers did nothing wrong. See ("However, an inquiry to the parties' attorneys revealed that on Aug. 8, 2009, the case proceeded to trial, and at the end of the evidence on Abie's side, the court granted Johnson's motion for judgment as a matter of law. The judge concluded that Abie had not made a sufficient case against him for the jury to find him liable and that, alternatively — now having heard the evidence and assessed it neutrally — Johnson was entitled to qualified immunity. Her claims against the school resource officers proceeded to the jury, which returned a verdict in their favor.") and . 2601:47:4001:E830:81F4:8F4C:C81B:285E (talk) 03:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply