This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article was acceptedon 9 January 2010by reviewer MWOAP(talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
"He is one of sixty-two state elected officials in America who serve in the Armed Forces." This appears twice in this article. How are we going to keep that statistic up to date, and ensure that the two counts match? I have no answer, except to suggest that it probably should not appear in the article at all. Chris the speller (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A sentence from the "Norwich city alderman" section states that "Coutu earned a seat as an alderman on the Norwich City Council in 2007." However, the next sentence goes on to say that "During his tenure on the city council, he served on several committees, including the Board of Zoning Appeals, Mohegan Park Advisory, Public Works and Rehabilitation Review in 2001" (emphasis added). If he was elected in 2007, he wasn't there in 2001. As I do not know what 2001 should be changed to, or if it is somehow correct but it is the sentence that needs to be rewritten for clarity, I tagged the sentence with {{Citation needed}}. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 07:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This article relies on statements of puffery and assigns moral views to the subject rather than making neutral fact statements from which the reader could draw a similar conclusion. Additionally, the article draws too much from the subject's own statements and not enough from statements about the subject. Thus, the subject's role in several legislative events is overstated.
The article describes the intent of legislation through a conservative lens and uses subtle cues which criticize actions of opposing parties or forces as opposed to describing them as they occurred. Subtle editorializing occurs throughout. 76.119.43.139 (talk) 14:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)MarkReply
Agreed. I'm tagging this. One particularly problematic section is the one on his political positions, with terms like "passionate about defending the ... Constitution" and something about supporting the rights of "law-abiding citizens"? I mean, come on. I think we can be a bit more descriptive. These vague statements and lionization of Coutu doesn't serve the interests of our readers. -Kudzu1 (talk) 03:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Dubious selection of facts and little or no criticism about this candidate occurs in this article. Isn't it a little odd that a state legislator has such an exhaustive Wikipedia page? I suspect this was written by one of his staffers and sources were found to support their assertions afterward. This needs more point-counterpoint and less trumpet-blowing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.127.250.45 (talk) 18:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure a state legislator isn't empowered to single-handedly strike down state laws. Did the original author (whom I take to be either Representative Coutu himself or a member of his staff) mean Coutu criticized the law? Did a court find it unconstitutional? Was Coutu a named plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the law's constitutionality? All of the above? The wording needs to be much clearer. -Kudzu1 (talk) 21:38, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
