Talk:Cheviot sheep

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Livestock task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The sub-stub on North Country Cheviot should be merged here, unless there are significant differences between the main breed and the sub type. Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 11:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

history

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As I understand it, the cheviot was very important in the social history of Scotland. IF anyone knows more, please add a paragraph90.11.101.43 (talk) 06:03, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

It has massive cojones

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is it just me or do their balls seem a bit too big?? 80.233.58.183 (talk) 09:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm thinking of trying to do a bit of (much-needed) work on this page – adding further refs and an infobox, expanding the text and so on. If I were to do so I would switch it to the list-defined reference system – refs defined in the reference section, not in the text – and to plain-text refs (without cite templates). I'll probably do that in a day or two if no-one minds, but will of course leave well alone if there's any objection. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:27, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply