Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Charles Goldstein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by TarnishedPath in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by TarnishedPath talk 11:42, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that Charles Goldstein helped recover $160 million worth of art stolen from victims of The Holocaust?
Created by Guerreroast (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 23 past nominations.

Roast (talk) 00:46, 22 October 2025 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

    QPQ: No - Second QPQ is required
    Overall: @Guerreroast: article looks all good and hook is interesting (shocked that you didn't try one with the Trump comment), but DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and all nominators with more than 20 past nominations (you have 23) need to submit two QPQ's, I believe. 1brianm7 (talk) 16:26, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

    actually, looking at the hook a little closer, the hook is cited to the headline, violating WP:HEADLINES; the body only says that the organization has recovered $160 million, so I think it might need to be reworked a bit. 1brianm7 (talk) 16:33, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
    Ok, QPQs checks out. My issue with ALT0 is that the NYT says the commission says it has recovered 160 million, and it says Goldstein was counsel to it, but it never makes the connection that he helped recover those 160 million, only noting his involvement in some of the cases. Regardless, ALT1 is approved, though if I could put forward a syntax change to make it pop, ALT1a: "... that Donald Trump nicknamed a lawyer "Sir Charles" because they would "act like royalty"? 1brianm7 (talk) 20:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply