This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This page, created by a sockpuppet, is about a type of product, so the relevant notability guideline is WP:NPRODUCT, which says, A product or service is appropriate for its own Wikipedia article when it has received sustained coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. I am not convinced this product has such coverage. The references in the article are pretty poor, with some obvious product placement sources, and a source that is not talking about the product at all. A quick search of books shows that there are short mentions in some books. The product is a thing, but WP:SIGCOV is harder to find. Because it is not a single product of one company, I felt that taking this straight to AfD may not be right in this case. Are there better sources we can find here? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:28, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
