Talk:Candle warmer

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 November 2017. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Textiles?

Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't think this article should be considered a textile arts stub. 192.135.209.8 20:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I'm removing it from that category.DroEsperanto 04:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Recommend for deletion

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is a terrible stub, it contains no references, is poorly presented and would not meet the notoriety guidelines of any encyclopedia I've read. I'm not a "Wiki" expert so could someone put the correct templates on here and lets fix it of get rid if it. JustinRJoneZ (talk) 08:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The article is already tagged for lack of references and possible original research. If you believe the article should be deleted, then WP:AFD lists the steps you need to follow to nominate the article for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 14:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Recent Improvements (June 2025)

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Significant improvements were made to the article in June 2025 to bring it closer to Wikipedia's quality standards:

Rewrote and expanded all major sections (definition, types, usage, advantages, disadvantages, safety, and related products).
Integrated inline citations throughout using reliable secondary sources such as Martha Stewart, CNA Lifestyle, Architectural Digest, MarcoPaul.co.uk, and government and fire safety agencies.
Added market data and global usage insights with citations from Verified Market Research and Global Market Insights.
Corrected tone, added structure using appropriate headings, and formatted the article to match encyclopedic style.
Updated the "Disadvantages" section to include sourced critiques from multiple industry analyses and expert commentary.
Upgraded project category to "Start"

Jcipc2004 (talk) 18:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply