Talk:Bromine

Bromine has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 20, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Elements Top‑importance

	Chemistry portal This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English with IUPAC spelling (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse; aluminium, sulfur, caesium) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 365 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by if there are more than 2.

Information Sources Some of the text in this entry was rewritten from Los Alamos National Laboratory - Bromine. Additional text was taken directly from the Elements database 20001107 (via dict.org), Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) (via dict.org) and WordNet (r) 1.7 (via dict.org). Data for the table was obtained from the sources listed on the main page and Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements but was reformatted and converted into SI units.

Consensus for Oxford spelling

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

LTA

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I would like a consensus to use Oxford spelling. Chemistry related articles often use Oxford spelling, and I think this one should, too. Theonepoppa6 (talk) 21:08, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

To be blunt: it is not necessary for one to campaign across a class of articles looking to fix or refix the WP:ENGVAR situation. From experience, it is usually creates far more disruption than it prevents (which is the point of the guideline). Remsense ‥ 论 21:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Remsense: there’s already a consensus to use Oxford spelling.

Theonepoppa6, could you please specify what -ise spellings you see? 2600:6C5A:557F:D058:6D3B:27F7:B5EA:9E8A (talk) 01:54, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply