Talk:Bootles' Baby
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Dclemens1971 in topic Did you know nomination
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Bootles' Baby appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 October 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Dclemens1971 talk 13:23, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
( )
Newspaper illustration for Bootles' Baby
- ... that Bootles' Baby's author's baby was Bootles? Source: "His mother Henrietta was a novelist ... in 1885 her novel ‘Bootles Baby: a story of the Scarlet Lancers’ first appeared ... Eliot, known as ‘Bootles’ to his family..." Macdonald 2013
- ALT1: ... that Edison Studios doubled the length of their Bootles' Baby adaptation after a competing British film was released? Source: "Edison released the one-reel Bootles’ Baby in 1910 ... four years later, in 1914, after London Film Company produced a British version of Bootles’ Baby, Edison reissued the title (as Bootle’s Baby, making the name singular), billing it as a “Two-Reel Edison Drama. An Improved Version of John Strange Winter’s Delightful Story.” Edison either remade the 1910 film or added new scenes to increase the length of the original" AFI Catalog -- doubled from one reel to two
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Nicholas of Hanapes
~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Article was created on 22 August 2025 and is longer than 1,500 characters. It is fully sourced (with the acceptable exception of the plot synopsis), neutral and free of plagiarism. The hook is cited and interesting, particularly ALT0. The picture is free to use, is used in the article and clear at a small size. QPQ is done. The only comment I'd have on the article is that the lead section is too short, but it's not a blocker for DYK. Grnrchst (talk) 09:43, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- Start-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- Start-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- Start-Class Theatre articles
- Low-importance Theatre articles
- WikiProject Theatre articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
