Talk:Blood Rights
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Mariamnei in topic Feedback from New Page Review process
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blood Rights article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
}}
Comments left by AfC reviewers
[edit source]
Comment: We need to see in-depth coverage of the subject that is independent of the subject itself. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:31, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment: Fails WP:NTELEVISION - IMDb is not an acceptable or reliable secondary source and the BBC website is a primary source. Dan arndt (talk) 04:34, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit source]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary sources and establish notability as per WP:GNG. Thanks and have a good day!
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Unassessed AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/10 August 2026
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Unassessed London-related articles
- Unknown-importance London-related articles
- Unassessed television articles
- Unknown-importance television articles
- Unassessed British television articles
- Low-importance British television articles
- British television task force articles
- Unassessed Episode coverage articles
- Unknown-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles


