Talk:Blade off testing

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

United 232 could not have been saved by an improved containment ring. The fan disk disintegrated which resulted in the separation of more fan blades than modern-day containment systems could safely deal with. 137.186.131.243 (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Jet engine#Compressor blade containment|compressor or fan blade]] The anchor (Compressor blade containment) has been deleted.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error