Talk:Bis-TOM

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bis-TOM article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pharmacology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs

Molecule(s) not correct?

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The 2D molecule on the page does not correspond to the imagine in the pihkal entry. If I am correct, the former is a 1,2,4,5 configuration of some sort and the latter is a 1,3,4,6, if I remember my Benzene ring correctly. Having said that, it appears that the image in the external entry is in fact the incorrect one. In any case they look different, or perhaps I am just too high and not seeing something obvious? --Kst447 (talk) 02:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The molecules are perfectly correct. See arene substitution patterns article for more information. --Harbinary (talk) 10:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply