This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Benjamin Disraeli article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The current one is bizarre and makes him look very weird looking. Had to scroll to find normal ones of him standing straight and looking directly at the camera, like your average profile picture would do. There are many better in this article, someone should change it. I don’t know how. 2601:8C0:880:4750:58FE:7525:4075:C637 (talk) 15:42, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I cannot fathom that this is a real quote. I cannot find the source that is listed (Aldous, p. 225; and Blake (1967), pp. 525–526) and I really want to know if this was an actual quote. Very funny if true but I don't believe it.
The Aldous reference under Sources includes a link to the book (you need an Internet Archive account to read it). Aldous cites Mollie Hardwick's Mrs Dizzy (p.191), and she cites the diary of Lord Rosebery, 14 May 1899 (which I haven't found online). Vexald (talk) 08:42, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 hours ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I am reviewing this article as part of WP:URFA/2020 an initiative to review Wikipedia's older featured articles. I have outined some of my concerns below:
The article is quite long, at 14,700 words. WP:SS says articles can start to be considered too long at over 8,000 words and WP:TOOBIG says text should probably be spun out at 9,000. I think there are sections with too much detail that can be summarised more effectively and have important information explained in better detail in child articles.
There are some uncited statements in the article.
There are some short, one sentence paragraphs in the article that should be formatted more effectively.
The "Political" and "Role of his Jewishness" sections both use lot of blockquotes, which may not adhere to WP:SS and might cause copyright problems. Other block quote in the article should be considered for summarising instead.
Tim riley got it to FA with me. These seem minor, I'm sure we can clean it up. I don't consider the length an issue, this is a major figure who also had a literary career as well as a political one. Wehwalt (talk) 13:11, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply