Talk:Battle of Walong

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Indian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Feedback from New Page Review process

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: I had to remove the bibliograph section.It was using an illegal redirector instead of direct links.

scope_creep^Talk 22:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Scope creep: The removal left several references that no longer link to the removed citations, e.g.: {{sfn|Singh|2016|p=172}}, among others. Can these be fixed? —GoldRingChip 21:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@GoldRingChip: I see they were knackered before I got there hence the unreliable reference template I left. scope_creep^Talk 22:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Scope creep: Can you please also remove the {{sfn}}s to which they point? —GoldRingChip 00:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@GoldRingChip: That is reference. Dude I never wrote this article. Those are the reference I'm not removing them. scope_creep^Talk 07:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply