Talk:Barcelona Papyrus

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Barcelona Papyrus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 May 2012. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Barcelona Papyrus is the oldest liturgical manuscript containing a complete anaphora?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2012/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barcelona Papyrus.

Wikipedia

"quite used"

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The solecism "quite used" could mean "quite widely used" or "quite often used". It is impossible to decide which the editor intended.--Wetman (talk) 19:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the note. The article of Zheltov (in note 1) in its last page says "this anaphora was certainly well known in Egypt". So I've edited the text replacing "quite used" with "well known". A ntv (talk) 00:13, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply