Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Augustine Birrell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Augustine Birrell/Comments)
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Ne quid nemis in topic "in this post" in the intro

New file: Augustine Birrell; Katharine Frances Asquith (née Horner); Anthony Birrell by Lady Ottoline Morrell.jpg

[edit]

Recently the file File:Augustine Birrell; Katharine Frances Asquith (née Horner); Anthony Birrell by Lady Ottoline Morrell.jpg was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 21:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've incorporated a slightly modified (cropped) version. Thanks. Scolaire (talk) 07:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation of 'Birrell'

[edit]

Many Wiki pages begin with a phonetic spelling. For some reason, this one doesn't. Does Birrell rhyme with 'bell' or squirrel'? Valetude (talk) 15:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

With 'squirrel'. Scolaire (talk) 15:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Useful - I was just wondering this myself.Paulturtle (talk) 01:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Augustine Birrell/CommentsTalk:Augustine Birrell/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Assessed as mid-importance for WikiProject Ireland because he was Chief Secretary for Ireland. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 20:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 08:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Augustine Birrell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

"in this post" in the intro

[edit]

The sentence “In this post, he was praised…” is correct, but the word "post" is unclear.

Most readers (including me!) now take "post' to mean an online article which often has a POV or other opinionated stance. In this context it refers to an office or position, yet the modern meaning can mislead the reader and make it seem as if at one point the Wikipedia page praised or criticised the subject. This is not ideal in a disputed topic and is easily sorted out.

A clearer and safer choice would be “during his tenure”, “in this position”, or “while in office”. These avoid the digital meaning of post and state the point without confusion.

I also think making sure there's no ambiguity over who was assessing him - his contemporaries, or people from later, modern timeframes like historians and so on.

if it was in fact referring to how this was his contemporaries praising him and not a later assessment by stating " While in this position, contemporaries praised... etc" or others.

I think I am being somewhat pendantic but understand that this might be a confusing choice of phrasing for others.

let me know your thoughts.

Ne quid nemis (talk) 03:02, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply