Talk:Armorloricus davidi
Add topic| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Note
[edit]I would like to note that this species has a lot in common with another species within its genus, A. davidi. Most of the information was regarding both of them from the same study. If anyone digs deeper, they could potentially outline the specifics of each species.
Complete
[edit]This article has an okay amount of the basic information, so I will probably stop editing it soon. If anyone else would like to continue, use this source . Thank you.
Disclaimer
[edit]I am actively researching this page and finding things to differentiate this species from other species within its genus. LightningThrower (talk) 18:08, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- This is outdated. Refer to "Complete". LightningThrower (talk) 17:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
See also
[edit]Why shouldn't there be a see also. I get that its in the categories, but its just a faster way, a more direct link.
Thanks for you work, -- LightningThrower (talk) 17:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- The issue isn't categories, the issue is that the article itself links already. See also should not contain anything already in the article. Jerod Lycett (talk) 19:17, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ya sorry that was meant to be a link to elegans. I'll fix it. LightningThrower (talk) 19:34, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, what Jerod said. MOS:NOTSEEALSO says "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body." Armorloricus and Loricifera were already linked, and I didn't see the point in having a link to only one of the other two species in the genus. Plantdrew (talk) 20:09, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ya sorry that was meant to be a link to elegans. I'll fix it. LightningThrower (talk) 19:34, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
