Talk:Arielle Prepetit

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SonOfYoutubers talk 04:52, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that actress Arielle Prepetit was cast in the first Black Daytime soap opera in 35 years, Beyond the Gates?

• Source:

• • ALT1: ... that actress Arielle Prepetit performed at Walt Disney World? Source:
  • ALT2: ... that actress Arielle Prepetit was happy to work with Karla Mosley as she had seen her on other soap operas? Source:
  • ALT3: ... that American actress Arielle Prepetit can also speak Haitian Creole? Source:
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Elora's Dad
  • Comment: Please let me know if any of the hooks need tweaking or if there is anything I should change

Created by DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.

DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 11:01, 23 June 2025 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article was recently created. ALT0 and ALT3 are both interesting and cited. ALT1 and ALT2 don't seem as interesting. Nice work. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

An image of Arielle Prepetit

Hello! I think that this article needs an image of Arielle Prepetit. Most articles with an actor/actress have an image of them and this one does not, I am very new to Wikipedia editing and still learning so if anyone wants to add an image of her please do, in the meantime I will be figuring out how to do exactly that :) Arbie.wizarD (talk) 22:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Arielle Prepetit/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 12:28, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 14:13, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

I'll review this article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   The image of a co-worker is decorative, not an aid to encyclopedic understanding.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Sourcing

The sourcing needs improvement. There are three references to BroadwayWorld, which per WP:RSP is generally unreliable. There are two YouTube interview videos used to cite unencyclopedic information. There is extensive use of the actor's resume, which is obviously a biased, non-independent, self-published source and thus to be used with extreme caution—or better yet, not used at all. In addition, there are numerous cases where the source url is not marked as live, causing the archived version to be the default; this is very irritating and should be fixed. The three sentence from "Prepetit revealed that..." to "...has been a blessing."" are sourced to the same PR, WP:PRIMARY interview which should only be used minimally—I'd cut the entire third sentence, and combine and trim the first two. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:18, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

• @DaniloDaysOfOurLives: In case you didn't see the above. Are you interested in moving forward with this? Z1720 (talk) 14:08, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

  I am very sorry, I completely forgot about this GA due to some health issues in my life. I completed most of the improvements but need to address one more, which I will do soon in the next week. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 07:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  @AirshipJungleman29: I have added more sources, removed BroadwayWorld, trimmed the sentences you recommended and others and marked the sources as live. I think that is everything DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 12:01, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

  Just in case you missed this @AirshipJungleman29: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:56, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

  @AirshipJungleman29: Is everything okay? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 19:00, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  Apologies, missed this.

• There is a fair amount of material cited to the first paragraph of this source which verges on WP:CLOP, and which is somewhat awkward/ungrammatical/repetitive. E.g. "When she was five years old, she "fell in love" with dance and trained during her adolescence as she wanted to be a dancer. When she was 17, she decided that she wanted to be on broadways and with the guidance of her teacher, she signed up for acting classes using the money she made from babysitting. She then decided to pursue an onscreen acting career but continued to perform and dance."
• Not sure about the reliability of the websites FilmFreeway and PluggedIn; could you please confirm that they're reliable?
• I think material should only be cited to her resume if it's to backup actual independent RS.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:32, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

• • DaniloDaysOfOurLives ping ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

    @AirshipJungleman29: I sorted the CLOP out and rephrased the sentences, and I removed the sources you mentioned as the consensus is that they are unreliable. Regarding her resume, I do not think they should be removed as these are productions that she appeared in, and per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD it should not be dismissed just because it is not 100% primary. The source does not say anything other than her appearances and so it is not like it is being promotional or anything - I am only using it to back up some of her appearances. I only used it for certain productions. It is also worth noting that this is not a resume that she has published herself but is from a well-known website. If these are not okay then I think this should just be closed as this GA has been opened for months now and I do not want to cause more stress for either of us on this. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 10:29, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

    Hi DaniloDaysOfOurLives, the issue isn't that it is a primary source, but that it is non-independent. You can see at the website's FAQ ("An Actors Access profile ... is submitted by you and/or your Talent Representatives to Casting for consideration") that this is a paid service that advertises resumes on the behalf of actors or talent agents. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

    Alright, closing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.