Talk:Alistrati

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Alistrati/CommentsTalk:Alistrati/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The article needs clean-up and wikifation.--Yannismarou 13:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 13:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alistrati. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150921212047/http://dlib.statistics.gr/Book/GRESYE_02_0101_00098%20.pdf to http://dlib.statistics.gr/Book/GRESYE_02_0101_00098%20.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Citation Needed.

I have noticed that the page contains three parts on the bottom which are sports, education, entertainment. I try to found some reliable resources however, I didn't found any. I believe that we need a citation to make the content verifiable and more reliable. --YIFAN Andrew Wang (talk) 07:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Close paraphrasing

I noticed that in old paragraph 1, the sentences "Remarkable traditional community one of the biggest of the area Zichni-Fillida. It's been up-graded to municipality of Alistrati with the "Kapodistrias" law and included the villages :Agioxori, Skopia, Mandili, Lefkothea and R.S of Aggista." seems to be close paraphrasing similar to the source from http://www.alistraticave.gr/index.cfm?id=9&lang=en. --YIFAN Andrew Wang (talk) 08:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Cleanup

I have made a new paragraph one since I think the old one is not perfect. But I am not sure whether I am able to remove the old paragraph. Can someone teach me and help me to improve it? --YIFAN Andrew Wang (talk) 08:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Unsupported categorization as an Aromanian settlement

The addition of the category “Aromanian settlements” to this article is problematic and requires a reliable source and appropriate context in the article itself. The category was initially added without any corresponding statement in the body of the article. This is particularly problematic because the settlement is not an exclusively Aromanian village. Categorizing it simply as an “Aromanian settlement”, without any explanation or qualification, may therefore give readers the misleading impression that it is or historically was an exclusively Aromanian settlement. This also appears inconsistent with the majority of the other settlements currently included in this category. Most of them are settlements that are either predominantly Aromanian or have/had a significant Aromanian population, and this is explicitly discussed and sourced in the main text of their respective articles. In this case, however, the article contains no such information at all. After the category was reverted, a Further reading section was added apparently in support of the categorization. However, the cited work does not establish that the village is an exclusively Aromanian settlement. Moreover, Further reading is not a substitute for sourced article content. It is unusual to add a Further reading section solely to support information that appears nowhere in the article itself and is conveyed only through a category. If the Aromanian population or heritage of the village is historically significant and supported by reliable sources, this should first be explained accurately and with the necessary context in the body of the article. An appropriate category can then be considered based on what the article actually establishes. I will remove both the category and the Further reading addition in their present form unless the categorization can be supported by properly sourced and appropriately contextualized article content. For additional context, the editor making these changes has previously been blocked on the Greek Wikipedia in connection with similar editing. serresmap 💬 15:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)