Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Albert Einstein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 days ago by Hyper1915fixation in topic Mathematics
Former featured articleAlbert Einstein is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleAlbert Einstein has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 12, 2005.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 13, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
November 16, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
October 5, 2007Good article nomineeListed
June 14, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 18, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
May 8, 2023Good article reassessmentKept
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 2, 2004, June 30, 2005, June 30, 2006, April 18, 2017, March 14, 2024, March 14, 2025, and April 18, 2025.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Kept, with thanks to XOR'easter for their hard work. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

It looks like there's some uncited text and other problems including

  • If one end of a wormhole was positively charged, the other end would be negatively charged. These properties led Einstein to believe that pairs of particles and antiparticles could be described in this way.
  • Later, after the death of his second wife Elsa, Einstein was briefly in a relationship with Margarita Konenkova. Konenkova was a Russian spy who was married to the Russian sculptor Sergei Konenkov (who created the bronze bust of Einstein at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton).[67][68][failed verification]*the Einstein-Cartan theory section
  • The equations of motion section
  • The Adiabatic principle and action-angle variables section
  • In "Über die Entwicklung unserer Anschauungen über das Wesen und die Konstitution der Strahlung" ("The Development of our Views on the Composition and Essence of Radiation"), on the quantization of light, and in an earlier 1909 paper, Einstein showed that Max Planck's energy quanta must have well-defined momenta and act in some respects as independent, point-like particles. This paper introduced the photon concept (although the name photon was introduced later by Gilbert N. Lewis in 1926) and inspired the notion of wave–particle duality in quantum mechanics. Einstein saw this wave–particle duality in radiation as concrete evidence for his conviction that physics needed a new, unified foundation.
  • The matter waves section
  • Although he was lauded for this work, his efforts were ultimately unsuccessful. Notably, Einstein's unification project did not accommodate the strong and weak nuclear forces, neither of which was well understood until many years after his death. Although mainstream physics long ignored Einstein's approaches to unification, Einstein's work has motivated modern quests for a theory of everything, in particular string theory, where geometrical fields emerge in a unified quantum-mechanical setting.
  • The other investigations section
  • Einstein suggested to Erwin Schrödinger that he might be able to reproduce the statistics of a Bose–Einstein gas by considering a box. Then to each possible quantum motion of a particle in a box associate an independent harmonic oscillator. Quantizing these oscillators, each level will have an integer occupation number, which will be the number of particles in it.
  • Many popular quotations are often misattributed to him.[example needed]

and possibly more. Though some of these could have been general referenced and I missed it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Seems rather odd to open this without editing the article yourself or raising any issues on the article talkpage first. --JBL (talk) 18:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Information This review was put on hold for two months to relieve pressure on topic editors at GAR. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

On a first reading, none of the uncited statements look atrocious. Various standard textbooks/histories/biographies should cover them, I think. XOR'easter (talk) 18:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Working through these as I find the time. XOR'easter (talk) 21:04, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
All the {{citation needed}} tags are addressed now. XOR'easter (talk) 20:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
XOR'easter, thanks for your efforts. A couple of things still need to be directly cited: the quotes in the sentence beginning "As he stated in the paper" in the physical cosmology section, the Einstein–Cartan theory and Wave–particle duality sections. Also, do you think MOS:OVERSECTION is a problem at all? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The citation for the "As he stated in the paper..." is immediately preceding that passage. I don't see the need to repeat footnotes there.
There are more divisions into short subsections than I would have included, but I'm not sure that's a problem per se. XOR'easter (talk) 17:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


"Alberteinstein" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Alberteinstein has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 19 § Alanturing until a consensus is reached. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 18:50, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Enrollment date error in intro

[edit]

The second paragraph of the intro says "In 1897, at the age of seventeen, he enrolled in the mathematics and physics teaching diploma program at the Swiss federal polytechnic school in Zurich."

"1897" should be "1896".

The article's own body text says his Matura was "awarded to him in September 1896" and that "at seventeen, he enrolled in the four-year mathematics and physics teaching diploma program." The intro contradicts the body.

Also, 1897 minus 1879 = 18, not seventeen. The age and the year can't both be right. The age is correct, the year is wrong.

Sources confirming 1896:

  • The article's own "Childhood, youth and education" section
  • Britannica: "graduated in 1896" from Aarau, then enrolled at the polytechnic (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Albert-Einstein)
  • The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 1, Doc. 28: matriculation date October 29, 1896

Please change "In 1897" to "In 1896" in the second paragraph of the intro. Thank you. WikiContrib24 (talk) 00:26, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Another great catch!  Done (see message on your talk page for a link to the edit request wizard) Mikewem (talk) 00:34, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Mathematics

[edit]

Der Alte was by no means a mathematician, and he often lamented that he didn't know enough mathematics, but his childhood and his unequaled facility with solving differential equations suggested that with proper training he would have been formidable. It would be helpful to have a section on his relation to Mathematics. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Seymour has just volunteered to write the section himself.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyper1915fixation (talkcontribs) 14:37, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2026

[edit]
JamesdaBologna (talk) 10:26, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The 13th picture is currently upside down, therefore I am asking to revert it.

Yes, rotation performed by User:SteinsplitterBot at Commons here Not sure why. Have left a note at User talk:Steinsplitter#File:ETH-BIB-Einstein, Albert und Kollegen am Physik-Labor ETH-Portrait-Portr 10750.tif. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
It was requested by a Commons user on the 29th, again, not sure why. I've requested it to be re-inverted (hopefully correctly, I don't mess with Commons very much). DrOrinScrivello (talk) 13:50, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
And now  Done. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 14:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks, DrOrinScrivello. I have added some notes which identify the sitters in this photo and those in File:Berliner Physiker u Chemiker 1920.jpg. There is some interesting background to the identification of the individuals in this photo here. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:09, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply