Talk:Al Jazeera English

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Al Jazeera English article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 2 months

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Media Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Qatar High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Qatar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Qatar-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.QatarWikipedia:WikiProject QatarTemplate:WikiProject QatarQatar
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arab world Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Toby Dershowitz, Ashley Rindsberg (28 May 2026). "How Anonymous Wikipedia Editors Influence Global Narratives — and AI Systems". Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Retrieved 29 May 2026.

Are we even pretending to be neutral at this point?

Latest comment: 4 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion

WP:ARBECR

Compare this article with the article on the ADL.

In the ADL article, its pro-Israel advocacy is mentioned in the lede, and a huge chunk of the article is dedicated to criticism of its pro-Israel stance.

In the Al Jazeera article, its pro-Palestinian advocacy - which constitutes a similarly central focus for the network as pro-Israel advocacy is for the ADL - is never even mentioned in the article; not even once. pro-Palestinian/anti-Israel misinformation published by AJA and later retracted (or kept) is well-documented, as is its strong pro-Palestinian bias. In fact, pro-Palestinian advocacy is arguably what AJA is best known for by the general public.

Not a word on any this on this article.

Is anyone actually convinced that we're covering the two very comparable organisations neutrally? MeaningBasedOntology (talk) 16:28, 4 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you read the opening sentence of the second paragraph, we have touched on Al Jazeera’s reporting on the Gaza–Israel conflict. However, it would not be neutral to describe Al Jazeera as a pro-Palestinian advocacy group. You are comparing the ADL and Al Jazeera, but they are not the same. Al Jazeera is a news media organization. 🐈Cinaroot 💬 06:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The second paragraph mentions it does "in-depth coverage" of the Gaza-Israel conflict. It says nothing about Al Jazeera's pro-Palestinian advocacy or bias.

As for describing Al Jazeera as an advocacy group, I agree this would be inaccurate, since it doesn't ONLY do advocacy; it also does journalism, even if it's biased. But mentioning that Al Jazeera is known for its pro-Palestinian advocacy would be a neutral and well-supported statement, as reported by several reliable sources. Al Jazeera narrowly avoids outright stating its pro-Palestinian position (unlike ADL, which says it outright), but it does position itself as "an alternative to Western media" that serves as a counterbalance to the "Western bias", and it's pretty clear what this means in this context, since Israel is Western-aligned.

Anyway, can we agree that the fact that there is NO mention of its Palestinian and anti-Israel bias in the entire article - even in the Reception section - is not neutral? MeaningBasedOntology (talk) 13:46, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sure, Al Jazeera is currently reporting extensively on the Gaza war. That’s part of what they do- covering conflicts in the Middle East, such as the Arab Spring and others. 🐈Cinaroot 💬 06:31, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not sure what value you thought this comment would add to the discussion. I'm not denying that Al Jazeera covers the Gaza war. I'm just saying it quite obviously isn't neutral not to mention Al Jazeera's pro-Palestinian bias at all in this page, despite this being well-documented and being arguably what Al Jazeera is best known for. MeaningBasedOntology (talk) 13:47, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply