Talk:Agent harness
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 30 days ago by Bluerasberry in topic Maybe neologism, also based on AI sources
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agent harness article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maybe neologism, also based on AI sources
[edit]The sources cited may be written by AI. I cannot tell. But also in the AI development industry, humans get AI to write their documentation, so this could be an exceptional case.
The sources I am citing here are at the fringe of Wikipedia's WP:Reliable source guidelines. The named authors are established subject matter experts.
I do not usually write tech topics but I was seeing this term everywhere and it seems fundamental in discussions. The article test harness, made in 2005, is not the same concept.
I think this term is about a year old, so is currently a WP:NEO. I do not understand enough about this to be confident that right now it merits a stand alone Wikipedia article. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:33, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Artificial Intelligence articles
- High-importance Artificial Intelligence articles
- WikiProject Artificial Intelligence articles
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class software articles
- Mid-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Mid-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- Unknown-importance Computing articles

