Draft talk:Rogervoice
Add topicConnected contributor disclosure
[edit]I have a professional relationship with Rogervoice through my work supporting the growth of its mobile application. I am not employed by Rogervoice, and I do not receive separate compensation for editing Wikipedia.
Because of this connection, I created this article as a draft rather than moving it directly into article space. I welcome review, correction and editorial decisions from uninvolved editors.
Request for independent review
[edit]In light of the connection disclosed above, I do not intend to move this draft into article space myself.
The draft cites independent coverage including TechCrunch, Forbes, CBC, Le Figaro, La Tribune and Speech Technology, with regulatory sources used for regulatory facts.
I would appreciate review by an uninvolved editor. If the draft satisfies Wikipedia's notability, sourcing and neutrality requirements, I would be grateful for it to be considered through the appropriate review process.
Revision following AfC review
[edit]Following the AfC review of 12 August 2026, I have revised the draft to address the concerns raised.
The draft has been substantially shortened, with the separate Services and Operations sections removed. Product and service descriptions have also been reduced, and the remaining content is structured primarily as a sourced history of the company.
I have not resubmitted the draft at this stage. I intend to review the sourcing further, particularly against the requirements for significant coverage in independent secondary sources, before requesting another AfC review.
As previously disclosed, I have a professional connection with Rogervoice and welcome review and further changes by uninvolved editors.