Draft:KorMedi
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Bonadea 31 hours ago.
|
Submission declined on 6 August 2026 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Pythoncoder 33 hours ago.
|
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Declined by Sulfurboy 34 hours ago.Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. |
Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. Gamga59 (talk) 06:14, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Kormedi (Korean: 코메디닷컴) is a South Korean digital healthcare media outlet and platform founded in October 2006 by Korea Medicare. It publishes health, medical, and lifestyle news. The content is distributed through South Korean web portals including Naver and Daum.
History and Operations
[edit]Kormedi was established in October 2006 and officially launched in 2007 under the leadership of CEO Lee Sung-ju.[1] In 2007, it received the Digital Contents Award from the South Korean Ministry of Information and Communication.[2] The website also received HONcode (Health On the Net Foundation) certification in the same year.[3]
The company expanded its operations by releasing a doctor-finding mobile application called "Bedoc" in 2019.[4]
Services and Content
[edit]- Health and Medical Journalism: Publishes articles on disease prevention, treatments, and medical trends, written in consultation with a medical advisory board.
- BioWatch: A digital publication covering the bio-pharmaceutical industry, drug development, and public policy.
- Multimedia Content: Produces medical interviews and health seminars.
External links
[edit]References
[edit]- ↑ Choi Hyo-young (July 9, 2023). "[한국인터넷신문협회 기자교육 지상강좌] ② 이성주 코메디닷컴 대표 인터뷰" [[KINA Reporter Education] 2. Interview with Lee Sung-ju, CEO of Kormedi]. Safe Times (in Korean).
- ↑ "의료포털 코메디닷컴 디지털콘텐츠대상" [Medical Portal Kormedi wins Digital Contents Award]. Yonhap News Agency (in Korean). September 21, 2007.
- ↑ "의료포털 '코메디닷컴' 국제인증 획득" [Medical Portal 'Kormedi' acquires international certification]. Yonhap News Agency (in Korean). June 4, 2007.
- ↑ "코리아메디케어, '명의 찾기 앱' 베닥(Bedoc) 출시" [Korea Medicare launches 'doctor-finding app' Bedoc]. Kyunghyang Shinmun (in Korean). July 18, 2019.

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.