Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Useruser1x

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Useruser1x}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Useruser1x

• Useruser1x (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• J7t7c (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• 1WhoKnows (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• 70slegend (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Littlebeaver (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Code letter: D
• Supporting evidence: Talk:United_Nation_of_Islam#Full_protection_requested

Previously posted at Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets, but I suspect that checkuser will be the only way to determine if these are indeed socks or if they are meat puppets. Michaelbusch 17:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

The four accounts are obvious socks, question is if Useruser1x is the master, see SSP case. Please check for master. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Unrelated --Deskana (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.