Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Real96
Real96
[edit]| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 20:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC) |
- Real96 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Bearly541 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Code letter: C
Was being watched by several administrators's for violations such as trolling , harrassment and harrassment . Claimed harrasment that he/she was being stalked by an admin (KillerChihuahua) . She was caught harrassing other wiki members. . An RFC was about to take place , BUT, in an attempt to circumvent the RFC Bearly541 retired. Which is alright. There was no clear connection to Real96 until Real96 corrected the userpage for bearly541. . Bearly541 put a lot of work into The Links, Incorporated as Real96 works on it as well. . Real96 became more of a user when Bearly541 started was "retired." If an RFC was bout to be filed, and a user retired and starts to use another account. Then that is not acting within good faith. SuperStroke 20:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Corrects users on wrong article references. and , removes edits without checking references or factuality and states that there is vandalism when there isn't. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SuperStroke (talk • contribs) 23:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
- Neither C nor F apply. Bearly541 isn't community banned, or she would have an entry in her block log. And I see no vandalism by Real96. Please come back with a reason for checkuser. Picaroon 22:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- corrected F removed, and more evidence for C was inserted. SuperStroke 23:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Declined. Essjay (Talk) 01:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.