Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ramirez72
Appearance
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Ramirez72
[edit]| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 02:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC) |
- Ramirez72 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- FiLoCo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Code letter: F
Was just blocked for continual blatant incivility: AN/I thread diff (notice the diff is in response to somebody suggesting he was using socks). However, soon after the block FiLoCo (talk · contribs) returned to continue edit warring on Spanish language. Both users have a history of editng Spanish language articles, and have an uncanny ability to not properly use the preview button. Thus user appears to be evading block. Part Deux 02:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC
Likely --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 07:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- I blocked FiLoCo indefinitely before even waiting for Jp's confirmation, as it seemed pretty clear. I have, however, recieved an email from FiLoCo claiming absolute innocence, and a message from a non-logged-in Ramirez72. Please would you also check:
- Thanks. Proto::► 09:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- I have now unblocked FiLoCo as he is vehemently protesting his innocence, but will monitor his contributions. Proto::► 15:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- The latest ip is unrelated. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 16:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- I have now unblocked FiLoCo as he is vehemently protesting his innocence, but will monitor his contributions. Proto::► 15:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Proto::► 09:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.