Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Purtilo

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Purtilo (talk · contribs) 152.163.100.10 (talk · contribs) Vitam (talk · contribs) 128.8.128.33 (talk · contribs) 205.188.117.7 (talk · contribs) 66.92.151.249 (talk · contribs)

• Purtilo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• 152.163.100.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• Vitam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• 128.8.128.33 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 205.188.117.7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 66.92.151.249 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

As usual, whenever John Lott reaches a semi-stable state of temporary aggreement, the puppet patrol returns with their agressive reverting to their "not verifiable" (IOW - false), uncited version (without, as expected, any discussion). Can someone please verify if this is, in fact, a definitive use of sock puppetry or merely meatpuppets. Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Clerk note: Originally closed no action (stale). Thatcher131

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.

If you are creating a new request about this user, don't forget to edit this section and add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Purtilo}} The previous request (shown above), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (it will still appear here).