Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Matt57

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Matt57}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Matt57

• Matt57 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• MiiMiiM (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• MiiMiiMiiM (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• MiiMiis (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)

• Code letter: E

MiiMiiM seems to have been created to edit war on a number of pages:

• Stanley Dunin - Revert by Matt 57: , , . Same revert by MiiMiiM:
• Rodryg Dunin - Revert by Matt57: , , . Same revert by MiiMiiM:
• Antoni Dunin - Revert by Matt57: . Same revert by MiiMiiM:

Although the new account could be a new party to the dispute this seems unlikely, it sole edits being to support Matt57 are highly suspicious. However Matt57 claims the sock is someone else's and designed to incriminate him so it seems best to check... WjBscribe 04:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Note that another account, User:MiiMiiMiiM, has now repeated the same edits as User:MiiMiiM. WjBscribe 04:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

And a third account (User:MiiMiis) despite the hardblock of User:MiiMiiMiiM. Pages now protected. WjBscribe 04:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Judging from the first edits of User:MiiMiis, this appears to be a set-up. This is not a credible slip-up. Banned users User:Kirbytime and User:His excellency have proven proficient at cleverly manipulating WP processes, have targeted Matt57 in the past, and are likely culprits. I request that this be dealt with a.s.a.p. to get to the bottom of the matter.Proabivouac 04:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Proav. This is most definitely a sock of His excellency (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI). --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 05:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Unrelated to Matt57 (talk · contribs). Likely that they're His excellency (talk · contribs) as well I think, but I'd like Dmcdevit's confirmation on that, given that I'm new to checkuser and Dmcdevit is more experienced with His excellency. --Deskana (banana) 22:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Agreed that we're dealing with His excellency. Mackensen (talk) 00:43, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Apparently in coordination with User:Kirbytime; see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kirbytime. The details are under investigation, but the fact of coordination is clear. User:Cheszmastre may be a shared account.Proabivouac 03:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.