Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hardvice

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hardvice}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Hardvice

• Hardvice (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• FurryiamIAM (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)

I warned FurryiamIAM for something, and Hardvice replied in his name, quickly reverts himself, before FurryiamIAM replies. I already suspected FurryiamIAM to be a sockpuppet of Hardvice because of their similar edit pattern. They both edit articles up to 10 times in a row without actually changing anything at all in the article. , probably to gather a high edit count. The reason I request for a checkuser is that they both vote on the same AFD's, see WikiTree, WikiZnanie, Wikinfo and others. --Conti|✉ 15:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Declined If that's not obvious I don't know what is. That retraction of his gave me quite a laugh, though. Mackensen (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Heh, well. As that guy tends to scream "Admin abuse" really loudly everytime one of his socks gets blocked, I wanted to be extra correct this time. :) --Conti|✉ 15:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

It was really the only thing he could say, under the circumstances. Thatcher131 15:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.